Sunday, November 10, 2013

A COLUMN IN IMA MAGAZINE- ABT CUT PRACTICE

Several years ago, I did a monthly column in the monthly magazine of IMA Mumbai West "Medical Image". It involved publishing opinions of doctors on different issues and the column was named 'WHITEQUOTES'. 

Once I asked the doctors about Cut practice and following is the article:

IMA-NOVEMBER
IMA-NOV.
WHITEQUOTES
According to the MCI Act of 2002, splitting of fees (cut-practice) is designated as illegal and unethical. One study done in Ahmedabad (Bhat, IIM-A, 2003) found that 40% doctors engaged in this practice. Many doctors are probably not aware of the legal and ethical implications of this practice and regard it as a ‘necessary evil’. So we asked some members to respond to this contentious issue, and following are their responses:

Ideally while giving referrals, the primary consideration should be the expertise of the consultant. However, in cut-practice this is overtaken by monetary considerations. So, merit and skill are compromised. Ultimately patient loses out on good care.
Dr Sudhir Warrier, Orthopaedic surgeon, Dadar

It is widespread practice nowadays. In my opinion established consultants do not need to oblige anyone for referrals, but for fresh consultants it becomes difficult to get any work. The young specialists do not get work, not because they are worse doctors, but because they are raw and not known. So, to get referrals they offer financial incentives. By and large it is not right, but it becomes a question of survival for some.
Dr Ashok Shetty, Family Physician, Marol

I am against cut-practice as it is totally against medical ethics. We (doctors) should all come out in open against it- let the patient decide where to go for treatment. I don’t know about other fields, but in our field where we deal with life and death, this is completely unjustifiable.
Dr Neemish Kamat, Radiologist, Vile Parle West

There are two outlooks to it: Some people regard it as a professional kind of sharing of money, without any other connotation. The second aspect is that it may affect transparency in work, increases cost to patient and creates unnecessary obligations to the consultant. Patients may become suspicious and the Family Physician may lose the patient’s trust, which is not such a pleasant thing.
Dr Priyadarshini Gokhale, Family Physician, Bandra West

It is a current trend, so much so that it is becoming impossible for young doctors to establish practice without this system. So some consultants are forced to accept it, even though it is unethical.  Maybe, some senior consultants with an independent practice should leave this system. This practice has started as all the consultants are competing for attention of the limited number of patients who are capable of paying for their treatment.
Dr Rajiv Tungare, Consultant Physician, Goregaon.                                                                                

-Compiled by Dr Vani Kulhalli

No comments:

Post a Comment